The Fate of a Civilization Rests...

on how it channels the ambitions of its citizens. Is it more honorable, profitable, and celebrated to work hard and produce something of value, thus adding to the economy, and to serve your society by giving back to the community through civic virtue and service--or is it honorable, profitable, and rewarding to carve out a niche for yourself whereby you benefit economically and socially from access to political power? In short, will your best and brightest be pioneering research and expanding business and participating in the arts and politics in a fashion that generates wealth and culture, or will they be pursuing power, prestige and wealth through earmarks, lobbying, regulation, monopolies, political careers, and, in short, rent-seeking behaviors?

Does your society encourage Mugabe-style acquisition of wealth and prestige through political means, to the detriment of your economy, or does it restrain and curtail the ambitions of your ambitious citizens in such a manner as to benefit the entire society? Or at least protect that society from the aims of the ambitious and well-connected?

That's the synopsis of a conversation Paul Christensen and I had recently, of which I was reminded by this article declaring a shift in culture and power from New York City to Washington, D.C. All hail the "diplomatocracy."

I find it amusing that academia is considered a meritocracy. If academia is meritocratic, it is only in that it awards the academically adept...not necessarily the guys you want running things. There's a reason the maintenance shed guys don't have PhD's--it makes you too well-read and contemplative to be useful in a crisis. Now, hopefully my non-PhD plumber managed to fix my water heater this time. I need a shower.