From Pete Jones, the BBC's top 100 books. You're supposed to see how many you have read--I'm guessing Kat and Gustav are going to crush me here...unless I get to count extra points for having read the Lord of the Rings more than ten times. My addition is a one-word adjective describing how worthwhile I felt the reading experience to have been.
1. The Lord of the Rings, JRR Tolkien (X) excellent
2. Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen (X) muddled, boring, and pointless
3. His Dark Materials, Philip Pullman ( )
4. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams (X) brilliant and hilarious
5. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, JK Rowling ( )
6. To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee ( ) liked the movie? :)
7. Winnie the Pooh, AA Milne (X) cool
8. Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell ( ) But I have read, with awe, Brave New World
9. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, CS Lewis (X) excellent
10. Jane Eyre, Charlotte Brontë ( ) loathed the movie?
11. Catch-22, Joseph Heller ( )
12. Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë ( ) seriously?
13. Birdsong, Sebastian Faulks ( ) never heard of it.
14. Rebecca, Daphne du Maurier ( ) I'm guessing this is in the Bronte vein...
15. The Catcher in the Rye, JD Salinger ( ) no, but Franny + Zooey was awesome!
16. The Wind in the Willows, Kenneth Grahame (X) "there is nothing quite so worth doing as simply messing about in boats."
17. Great Expectations, Charles Dickens (x) abridged version with pictures was pretty cool as a kid....
18. Little Women, Louisa May Alcott (X) blechh. thanks, mom...
19. Captain Corelli's Mandolin, Louis de Bernieres ( )
20. War and Peace, Leo Tolstoy ( )
21. Gone with the Wind, Margaret Mitchell ( )
22. Harry Potter And The Philosopher's Stone, JK Rowling ( )
23. Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets, JK Rowling ( ) seriously? JRR only gets on of his trilogy? Where's the Silmarillion, huh?
24. Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban, JK Rowling ( )
25. The Hobbit, JRR Tolkien (X) whatever, Rowling, Tolkein should totally be the top five.
26. Tess Of The D'Urbervilles, Thomas Hardy ( )
27. Middlemarch, George Eliot ( )
28. A Prayer For Owen Meany, John Irving ( )
29. The Grapes Of Wrath, John Steinbeck ( )
30. Alice's Adventures In Wonderland, Lewis Carroll (X)
31. The Story Of Tracy Beaker, Jacqueline Wilson ( )
32. One Hundred Years Of Solitude, Gabriel García Márquez ( )
33. The Pillars Of The Earth, Ken Follett ( )
34. David Copperfield, Charles Dickens (x) abridged--pretty cool
35. Charlie And The Chocolate Factory, Roald Dahl (X) pretty cool
36. Treasure Island, Robert Louis Stevenson (X) great childhood memory!
37. A Town Like Alice, Nevil Shute ( )
38. Persuasion, Jane Austen ( )
39. Dune, Frank Herbert (X) I'm so glad this is on here...great book!
40. Emma, Jane Austen ( )
41. Anne Of Green Gables, LM Montgomery (X) unfortunately, yes, I have read this.
42. Watership Down, Richard Adams ( )
43. The Great Gatsby, F Scott Fitzgerald (X) didn't really get it...well written, though.
44. The Count Of Monte Cristo, Alexandre Dumas (x) abridged with pictures was awesome as a child!
45. Brideshead Revisited, Evelyn Waugh ( )
46. Animal Farm, George Orwell (X) vaguely remember it being pretty cool.
47. A Christmas Carol, Charles Dickens (X) great book...but the Muppets do it better :)
48. Far From The Madding Crowd, Thomas Hardy ( )
49. Goodnight Mister Tom, Michelle Magorian ( )
50. The Shell Seekers, Rosamunde Pilcher ( )
51. The Secret Garden, Frances Hodgson Burnett ( )
52. Of Mice And Men, John Steinbeck ( )
53. The Stand, Stephen King ( )
54. Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy ( )
55. A Suitable Boy, Vikram Seth ( )
56. The BFG, Roald Dahl ( )
57. Swallows And Amazons, Arthur Ransome ( )
58. Black Beauty, Anna Sewell (X) This book was awesome as a kid. And really sad...
59. Artemis Fowl, Eoin Colfer ( )
60. Crime And Punishment, Fyodor Dostoyevsky ( )
61. Noughts And Crosses, Malorie Blackman ( )
62. Memoirs Of A Geisha, Arthur Golden (X) was rather good, until it ended abruptly and uncharacteristically fairy-talish.
63. A Tale Of Two Cities, Charles Dickens (X) absolutely loved it. best ending line ever: "It is a better thing I do, than I have ever done before...It is a better rest I go to, than any I have ever known."
64. The Thorn Birds, Colleen McCollough ( )
65. Mort, Terry Pratchett ( ) I so need to buy more Pratchett...
66. The Magic Faraway Tree, Enid Blyton ( )
67. The Magus, John Fowles ( )
68. Good Omens, Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman ( ) have to buy this one soon...
69. Guards! Guards!, Terry Pratchett ( ) so glad he's on here!
70. Lord Of The Flies, William Golding ( )
71. Perfume, Patrick Süskind ( )
72. The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, Robert Tressell ( )
73. Night Watch, Terry Pratchett (X) the man's a genius.
74. Matilda, Roald Dahl ( )
75. Bridget Jones's Diary, Helen Fielding ( )
76. The Secret History, Donna Tartt ( )
77. The Woman In White, Wilkie Collins ( )
78. Ulysses, James Joyce ( )
79. Bleak House, Charles Dickens ( )
80. Double Act, Jacqueline Wilson ( )
81. The Twits, Roald Dahl ( )
82. I Capture The Castle, Dodie Smith ( )
83. Holes, Louis Sachar ( )
84. Gormenghast, Mervyn Peake ( )
85. The God Of Small Things, Arundhati Roy ( )
86. Vicky Angel, Jacqueline Wilson ( )
87. Brave New World, Aldous Huxley (X) was incredible...my introduction to all things distopian and apocalyptic. as a child. which might explain how messed up I am...
88. Cold Comfort Farm, Stella Gibbons ( )
89. Magician, Raymond E Feist ( )
90. On The Road, Jack Kerouac ( )
91. The Godfather, Mario Puzo ( ) the movie is amazing...
92. The Clan Of The Cave Bear, Jean M Auel ( )
93. The Colour Of Magic, Terry Pratchett (X) An excellent disciple of Douglass Adams
94. The Alchemist, Paulo Coelho ( )
95. Katherine, Anya Seton ( )
96. Kane And Abel, Jeffrey Archer ( )
97. Love In The Time Of Cholera, Gabriel García Márquez ( )
98. Girls In Love, Jacqueline Wilson ( )
99. The Princess Diaries, Meg Cabot ( )
100. Midnight's Children, Salman Rushdie ( )
Yeah, that one word adjective thing didn't last very long. If anybody has any Tolstsoy or Dostoevsky, I'll loan you Pratchett for 'em. :) I also have to mention number 101, one of my all time favorite books: Three Men in a Boat, by Jerome K. Jerome. And then, by corollary, one that should have made the list: To Say Nothing of the Dog, by Connie Willis. And, of course, if the entire world had more hardcore Christians in it, The Poisonwood Bible would have been up there as well.
16 February 2009
04 February 2009
On Irony, Cynicism, and Good Cheer
-An excellent essay on earnest vs. comic irony, and the effect of their adoption on the human soul.
-And why not read some Chesterton? Wine, and Solemnity or Comedy?
As a Christian, I spent years sweating over the salvation of souls, mine and others', without a really clear concept (short of going to heaven and being perfected someday) of what was being saved and what that salvation entailed. I just thought it meant that I would sin less and draw closer to God--so that's what I focused on.
One can, of course, do this and still be a miserable human being, quite lonely, merely by keeping all neighbors at a safe distance from one's true self, avoiding all unmanageable temptation, being devoted and dutiful, and having an utterly flavorless, controlled and moral life where one takes no unmanageable risks of love or hate and generally is a hermit fixated with making sure the goats give milk and the crops produce and nothing wrong or sinful has been done. Mostly at the cost of never confronting any aspect of one's self that cannot be predicted and controlled, stifling unfiltered desires and creativity, and generally losing your zest for life. And...your soul while you're at it.
All while having dotted the "i's" and crossed the "t's" on the standard Christ's Plan of Salvation. And never having touched the sheer terror of loving his neighbor or himself.
So your soul can be a miserable, pathological wreck...but saved? Is this what it's saved to?
Now I find it very important to think long and hard about my soul and the vitality thereof. What is it? What are its pathologies? What is it supposed to look like? Can the things that are obviously bad about my soul, my unique yet ever-changing personality, be made right? What, indeed, are the processes of saving a soul?
---
"But neither nature nor wine nor anything else can be enjoyed if we have the wrong attitude towards happiness, and Omar (or Fitzgerald) did have the wrong attitude towards happiness. He and those he has influenced do not see that if we are to be truly gay, we must believe that there is some eternal gaiety in the nature of things. We cannot enjoy thoroughly even a pas-de-quatre at a subscription dance unless we believe that the stars are dancing to the same tune. No one can be really hilarious but the serious man. “Wine,” says the Scripture, “maketh glad the heart of man,” but only of the man who has a heart." --G.K., Heretics, Chapter VII.
-And why not read some Chesterton? Wine, and Solemnity or Comedy?
As a Christian, I spent years sweating over the salvation of souls, mine and others', without a really clear concept (short of going to heaven and being perfected someday) of what was being saved and what that salvation entailed. I just thought it meant that I would sin less and draw closer to God--so that's what I focused on.
One can, of course, do this and still be a miserable human being, quite lonely, merely by keeping all neighbors at a safe distance from one's true self, avoiding all unmanageable temptation, being devoted and dutiful, and having an utterly flavorless, controlled and moral life where one takes no unmanageable risks of love or hate and generally is a hermit fixated with making sure the goats give milk and the crops produce and nothing wrong or sinful has been done. Mostly at the cost of never confronting any aspect of one's self that cannot be predicted and controlled, stifling unfiltered desires and creativity, and generally losing your zest for life. And...your soul while you're at it.
All while having dotted the "i's" and crossed the "t's" on the standard Christ's Plan of Salvation. And never having touched the sheer terror of loving his neighbor or himself.
So your soul can be a miserable, pathological wreck...but saved? Is this what it's saved to?
Now I find it very important to think long and hard about my soul and the vitality thereof. What is it? What are its pathologies? What is it supposed to look like? Can the things that are obviously bad about my soul, my unique yet ever-changing personality, be made right? What, indeed, are the processes of saving a soul?
---
"But neither nature nor wine nor anything else can be enjoyed if we have the wrong attitude towards happiness, and Omar (or Fitzgerald) did have the wrong attitude towards happiness. He and those he has influenced do not see that if we are to be truly gay, we must believe that there is some eternal gaiety in the nature of things. We cannot enjoy thoroughly even a pas-de-quatre at a subscription dance unless we believe that the stars are dancing to the same tune. No one can be really hilarious but the serious man. “Wine,” says the Scripture, “maketh glad the heart of man,” but only of the man who has a heart." --G.K., Heretics, Chapter VII.
02 February 2009
The Fate of a Civilization Rests...
on how it channels the ambitions of its citizens. Is it more honorable, profitable, and celebrated to work hard and produce something of value, thus adding to the economy, and to serve your society by giving back to the community through civic virtue and service--or is it honorable, profitable, and rewarding to carve out a niche for yourself whereby you benefit economically and socially from access to political power? In short, will your best and brightest be pioneering research and expanding business and participating in the arts and politics in a fashion that generates wealth and culture, or will they be pursuing power, prestige and wealth through earmarks, lobbying, regulation, monopolies, political careers, and, in short, rent-seeking behaviors?
Does your society encourage Mugabe-style acquisition of wealth and prestige through political means, to the detriment of your economy, or does it restrain and curtail the ambitions of your ambitious citizens in such a manner as to benefit the entire society? Or at least protect that society from the aims of the ambitious and well-connected?
That's the synopsis of a conversation Paul Christensen and I had recently, of which I was reminded by this article declaring a shift in culture and power from New York City to Washington, D.C. All hail the "diplomatocracy."
I find it amusing that academia is considered a meritocracy. If academia is meritocratic, it is only in that it awards the academically adept...not necessarily the guys you want running things. There's a reason the maintenance shed guys don't have PhD's--it makes you too well-read and contemplative to be useful in a crisis. Now, hopefully my non-PhD plumber managed to fix my water heater this time. I need a shower.
Does your society encourage Mugabe-style acquisition of wealth and prestige through political means, to the detriment of your economy, or does it restrain and curtail the ambitions of your ambitious citizens in such a manner as to benefit the entire society? Or at least protect that society from the aims of the ambitious and well-connected?
That's the synopsis of a conversation Paul Christensen and I had recently, of which I was reminded by this article declaring a shift in culture and power from New York City to Washington, D.C. All hail the "diplomatocracy."
I find it amusing that academia is considered a meritocracy. If academia is meritocratic, it is only in that it awards the academically adept...not necessarily the guys you want running things. There's a reason the maintenance shed guys don't have PhD's--it makes you too well-read and contemplative to be useful in a crisis. Now, hopefully my non-PhD plumber managed to fix my water heater this time. I need a shower.
Sundries
So, I read a two-line blip in TIME yesterday:
"$34,023: Amount of self-employment taxes Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner failed to pay on time from 2001 to 2004. The Senate confirmed him anyway, 60 to 34."
Well, hey, it's a time of trouble and crisis, and he's no doubt a smart guy, and President Obama wants him to help right our country, so expediency and better judgement once more trump tradition, and, I don't know, the law. Whatever, they know what they're doing, they're in charge!
The difference between our country and your average African governance cesspot used to be the Rule of Law. So what is it now?
Hey, also, this is cool:
(h/t clusterflock)
Which leads me to my final point--the chief difficulty with good governance in the states is that it takes so much time. William F. Buckley pointed out last year that we don't require anything more of our politicians than weak sentiment enshrined as law, instead of carefully thought out, highly descriptive legislation. We are, as a nation, routinely legislating "shoulds" that are then left up to professional bureaucrats to interpret and then apply in the form of crafting institutions and policy. How many of us have read the bailout package? How many of us know where to go to read the bailout package? No. I certainly haven't. Who has the time? There are a myriad of other, more entertaining things to do with my time. As long as it's titled "Stimulus Package," and discussed as such in sixty-second soundbites, we assume that's what it's supposed to do. If it works, we will praise President Obama, and if it fails, we will vilify...someone...and then demand change...in the form of someone else...who we will then ignore until he screws up or makes us angry. I mean, that's how we got into two wars and started torturing people without any form of due process and nationalized our banking system...all under a "conservative" "pro-business" president.
Yeah, the nation that used to celebrate heroes who would die rather than dishonor their country now cowers behind some sort of possible terrorism justification. "Who knows how many acts of terror would be committed if we didn't make some mistakes or violate our ethical boundaries in the pursuit of our enemies." Oh, I don't know, but I'd rather have terrorist attacks on our soil than commit our country to policies that violate our national morality. Our country will not fail if a few thousand citizens die horribly, or we lose an entire city to an epic disaster. We certainly made it through Hurricane Katrina without any abatement of our growth economy. And in an economic recession, dudes can still whip out cool YouTube content via their own creativity. The American dream can survive terrorist attacks--what it cannot survive is the death of it's commitment to human rights, liberties, and the rule of law that protects them.
"$34,023: Amount of self-employment taxes Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner failed to pay on time from 2001 to 2004. The Senate confirmed him anyway, 60 to 34."
Well, hey, it's a time of trouble and crisis, and he's no doubt a smart guy, and President Obama wants him to help right our country, so expediency and better judgement once more trump tradition, and, I don't know, the law. Whatever, they know what they're doing, they're in charge!
The difference between our country and your average African governance cesspot used to be the Rule of Law. So what is it now?
Hey, also, this is cool:
(h/t clusterflock)
Which leads me to my final point--the chief difficulty with good governance in the states is that it takes so much time. William F. Buckley pointed out last year that we don't require anything more of our politicians than weak sentiment enshrined as law, instead of carefully thought out, highly descriptive legislation. We are, as a nation, routinely legislating "shoulds" that are then left up to professional bureaucrats to interpret and then apply in the form of crafting institutions and policy. How many of us have read the bailout package? How many of us know where to go to read the bailout package? No. I certainly haven't. Who has the time? There are a myriad of other, more entertaining things to do with my time. As long as it's titled "Stimulus Package," and discussed as such in sixty-second soundbites, we assume that's what it's supposed to do. If it works, we will praise President Obama, and if it fails, we will vilify...someone...and then demand change...in the form of someone else...who we will then ignore until he screws up or makes us angry. I mean, that's how we got into two wars and started torturing people without any form of due process and nationalized our banking system...all under a "conservative" "pro-business" president.
Yeah, the nation that used to celebrate heroes who would die rather than dishonor their country now cowers behind some sort of possible terrorism justification. "Who knows how many acts of terror would be committed if we didn't make some mistakes or violate our ethical boundaries in the pursuit of our enemies." Oh, I don't know, but I'd rather have terrorist attacks on our soil than commit our country to policies that violate our national morality. Our country will not fail if a few thousand citizens die horribly, or we lose an entire city to an epic disaster. We certainly made it through Hurricane Katrina without any abatement of our growth economy. And in an economic recession, dudes can still whip out cool YouTube content via their own creativity. The American dream can survive terrorist attacks--what it cannot survive is the death of it's commitment to human rights, liberties, and the rule of law that protects them.
01 February 2009
Ten Things I Love About Barack
1. He can talk in complete sentences in Midwestern English that make sense (this is not a racial comment, it's a reference to his predecessor).
2. He achieved public office (and went to an Ivy League School, for that matter) without politically influential family connections (see above), thus epitomizing the American dream.
3. Rather than taking his Ivy League degree and getting a highly-paying corporate management position, he got involved in community outreach and public service. (also, see above)
4. He has personally demonstrated an above-average level of civility and class in public discourse. (nope. I'm pretty much done trashing 43, that had absolutely nothing to do with him and everything to do with everyone else.)
5. He appears to be a loving husband to his wife and a loving father to his children.
6. He has quietly reminded the nation that tobacco is more than just a Republican special interest group or a mark of the unenlightened mind.
7. He is a prominent African American celebrity who also happens to be a Harvard-educated lawyer, was raised by a single mother and her parents, moved from school to school growing up, and is renowned for his community activism, ability to build bridges, and eloquent speechmaking. This is good for helping all Americans of all hues loosen their preconcieved notions and participate more creatively and productively in our economy and society.
8. As a new president with a clean slate and a mandate for change, he is capable of addressing diplomatic issues and international actions with a broader array of options than the previous president, who was tied down to commitments and actions chosen during the dark days after 9/11 and during the rise of the new phenomenon of globalized terrorism, and burdened by a lack of international goodwill. (gotta throw Bush a bone somewhere in here...it was a hell of a time to be a president)
9. He has a name with Arabic roots, and Hebrew and Swahili derivations, and a wide usage, all of which I am familiar with linguistically, thus providing me with an excellent way to impress pretty, enthusiastic Obama supporters in bars.
10. He has visited upon us a great mercy, by luring our pantsuited carpetbagger away from the Great State of New York. God bless ex-Senator Clinton...and keep her far away from here!
2. He achieved public office (and went to an Ivy League School, for that matter) without politically influential family connections (see above), thus epitomizing the American dream.
3. Rather than taking his Ivy League degree and getting a highly-paying corporate management position, he got involved in community outreach and public service. (also, see above)
4. He has personally demonstrated an above-average level of civility and class in public discourse. (nope. I'm pretty much done trashing 43, that had absolutely nothing to do with him and everything to do with everyone else.)
5. He appears to be a loving husband to his wife and a loving father to his children.
6. He has quietly reminded the nation that tobacco is more than just a Republican special interest group or a mark of the unenlightened mind.
7. He is a prominent African American celebrity who also happens to be a Harvard-educated lawyer, was raised by a single mother and her parents, moved from school to school growing up, and is renowned for his community activism, ability to build bridges, and eloquent speechmaking. This is good for helping all Americans of all hues loosen their preconcieved notions and participate more creatively and productively in our economy and society.
8. As a new president with a clean slate and a mandate for change, he is capable of addressing diplomatic issues and international actions with a broader array of options than the previous president, who was tied down to commitments and actions chosen during the dark days after 9/11 and during the rise of the new phenomenon of globalized terrorism, and burdened by a lack of international goodwill. (gotta throw Bush a bone somewhere in here...it was a hell of a time to be a president)
9. He has a name with Arabic roots, and Hebrew and Swahili derivations, and a wide usage, all of which I am familiar with linguistically, thus providing me with an excellent way to impress pretty, enthusiastic Obama supporters in bars.
10. He has visited upon us a great mercy, by luring our pantsuited carpetbagger away from the Great State of New York. God bless ex-Senator Clinton...and keep her far away from here!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
